Communication is a tw?-way ?rocess. Communication is successful only when the receiver understands the me?sage intended by the sender. You should look at jeffbormaster.com for logical tips.When writing ?n business there are a few thing? that you should ?ons???r when ?ou beg?n to ??m??s? any t??e of communication. Fi??t of all you want all communications to make sense to the audience that you a?e speaking with. It doesn't matter if you are a brain ?u?geon and you are speaking t? a group of third graders, you must speak/write on a l?vel that your reader can understand. S??on? you should write your ??mmunicati?n? t? be as precise as possible. ?ou should not compose a communication that rambles and goes ?ff the topic that you've written about. Stay focu??d on your sub?e?t! Third once you've c?mp?led your written ?ommuni??t?on always do a s??ll ?nd grammar ch??k. Do Not send a written communication that is full ?f typos and misspelled w??ds. It doesn't look good for you or the company that you re?resent. And last but n?t least in our written communication s??tion emails. Business emails are th? norm and even if your writing suck? this is one area that you will most definitely want to excel in. Writing a business ?m?il is not like w??t?ng a personal email to ?ou? friend. Even, if you have a friendly relationship with the ?nd????u?l that you are emailing while on company t?m? or dealing with a business issue kee? your email formal. ??n?ling the con???n? ?f why you contacted the per?on(s) in the first pl??e.
When analyzing a ??tuation, add th?s theory to your tools for communi??ting. Is that person or th?t circumstance the 80% rule or th? 20% exception? E?ch side will require a different ?ttention or solution. If ?our ?m?l?ye? makes the same mistakes 80% ?f the time, the matter w?ll nee? a different approach then if h?/she makes the s?m? mistakes 20% ?f the time -- or a child at home or a student at school.
?n bu?in???, it is a known fact that 80% of th? ???ple in the w?rkfo?ce d?n't l?ke what they do and ?nl? about 20% a?e h?p?y in thei? j?bs -- 80/20. ??m?t?mes this will ???y, depending on some areas ?f work. ?f employees are loyal, c?-dependent, and if management ?s fair, th? ratio will vary. But, in general the majority of the peo?le in North America ?re working in jobs they either outg?ew, or they never w?nt?? in the first place, or th??r jobs do not reflect wh?t they would naturally do best.
Effective work?lac? communication is v??? e???ntial f?r smooth ?n? efficient functioning of an organization. The manager ?h?uld have ??op?r ??mmuni??ti?n with his subordinates, el?? it will lead to absenteeism ?mong?t workers, lowe? productivity, development of grapevine networks in an ?rgan?z?ti?n. There should be two-way communication ?n an organization. ??nager should have personal c?nt??t with his subordinates. He should clearly communi??te goals and policies of th? organization to h?? subordinates and should get feedback on these goals and policies. Maybe look at Click For More for current news.
I remember doing a ?ho?t-term contract for a multi-million dollar corporation. ?n my interview with the operations manager, I wa? ?sk?? about my ?h.D. listed on my r??um?. We briefly talked ?bout it and mov?d on. I was h?r?d ?n? after several m?nths, when I finished my ?ontract, the same manager asked me for my phone numb??, in case he needed some information. When I hand?? him my business card, he saw the Ph.D. ?n? said with a surprised look and ton?: "Ph.D.?" I said, "??u knew that!" ?? had completely forgotten. ?hat's how insignificant it wa? to h?m when he ?nter?iew?d me. ?ll the time I was there, I w?? ne??r taken at my l?v?l. I was to do my job as aske?, nothing mor?, noth?ng less. ?? views and ?omment? m??nt noth?ng, even when they were go?d, they were not e?pl?red further. ? was there to do a specific job an? that was it.
I know of another organization where top m?nagem?nt made sarcastic ?em??ks to their managers in management meetings ?uch as, "we have ?ll these managers ?et the company has to bring ?n outside consultants to fi? problems." And the? did. These people woul? come and go. ?h?y would w?lk around doing their intervi?w?ng and digging, then make their recommendations, an? the company managers who had b?en there for years were expected to follow them.
When any bus?ne?s meeting is concluded, results should be th? only thin discussed in any foll?w up meeting. Managers ne?ds to follow u? and expect results f??m team members. Holding people accountable seems to b? such a harsh word ?n today's workplace, but th? reality is, if ?ou don't hold people ?ccountabl?, y?ur business won't be around long.
Source: http://www.yapperz.com/LeiteajsguhaFenner/blog/swift-systems-of-workplace-communication-the-latest/
james farentino somali pirates navy seals navy seal team 6 tim gunn tim gunn built to last
কোন মন্তব্য নেই:
একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন